« "The Fun Theory" | Main | Finished some weeding around the blog »

November 30, 2009

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00e5520d04b888340120a6f146a2970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Bargaining with Your Right Brain:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Venkatesh Rao

Hmm... I hadn't thought of international relations when I wrote the piece. I can't quite parse your last sentence (couple of typos in there somewhere?), but I think you are suggesting that international relations have more real/substantive moves that can be made, and therefore game theory applies more, correct?

I can see why this is plausible. There is not much room for, say, Schelling-like brinkmanship in small retail bargaining (unless it is things like starting to take money out of your wallet...).

But OTOH, countries DO have big grand narratives that inform their negotiating posture far more powerfully than rational concerns. Some bits make it into formally stated doctrine (known or unknown to the other side), but other bits are left to the individuals.

I'd say the jury is still out on whether international relations conform better to narrative bargaining or game-theoretic. I'd suspect that in relatively symmetric situations, models like Axelrod's iterated prisoner's dilemma might work well, but when there is a big asymmetry, narrative models probably kick in.

Interesting direction to explore.

Venkat

The comments to this entry are closed.

Pages

February 2012

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29      

Intentional Blank Space